If something is removed, the space will be filled.
This is because there is nowhere in the universe that is completely empty. Everything has a minimal residual energy. We cannot attain any of the limits within which we are physically bound, let alone go beyond them. For instance, we can get extremely close to absolute zero, but not attain it. We can almost reach the speed of light, but not quite. Nor can we manifest a space in which there is zero energy,
The point here is that when something is removed, a “space” remains. That “space” is itself something. It is not that it disappears, as if it never existed—even though this is our everyday experience. For if I start with 10 oranges. Every day I eat 1. On day 9 I have 1 orange. On day 10, 0 oranges. It is as if they never existed… But that is on the gross plane, the realm of pure materiality. Let us use love. I have loved 10 women in my life. Today I am alone, for they have all left me, or died. Is that I have no more love in me? Not for any of them? Do they not still live in me? Did our love not change my life, each one? Could I say that this space of our love is empty, even though there is no one physically there? Where is the 0 point here?
#not-P In order to maintain the dynamic balance, i.e., the perfection and harmony, that exists in the whole, upon removing a single element, , there is be a , that forms at the same moment, from the removal of —the '“anti-, one could call it–which is the exact opposite, or reflection, of .
This system shows a remarkable randomness, even though it is constantly maintaining a “stable” state. There is no known or unknown “force” that keeps it in this ordered state or “produces” its state of order. It just does. We accept this so-called randomness in creation even though there are so many miraculous aspects to this process. That there is order in a seemingly random universe, is a miracle in itself! In order for this order to have “spontaneously” emerged, it would need an almost infinite amount of time to emerge. So, infinity is introduced into the equations describing the system—and we have an unnameable source of this infinite creation—the “designer” God—or not.
It seems like big jump from randomness to intelligent design, the latter being an acknowledgement of the awesomeness of our existence. Is it not a choice? Is it not just as far-fetched to propose a Infinite Being of Infinite Intelligence and power creating our world, as it is to propose that it is all just a random set of events? It is your choice!
Random allows us to act in an unthinking and uncaring fashion. For what difference does it make if it is all just random? What difference would it make as to how I act? All action is meaningless in a random universe!
Yet how to propose or justify an intelligence of an infinite nature running the show? This intelligence would be so much more than us, than we could even imagine, that it would be silly to try and “prove” its intelligence. There can be no IQ test possible for G-d.
[!note] Love
This is actually an expression of the love that is ex[ressed] by the universe. Also known as (the law of) attraction. Gravity being a specific example of that occurring between two bodies.
Footnotes
[^1] Ignoring the absurdity (for convenience?) of the infinite set of numbers (that is, the set of ALL numbers) is itself a number? This is reminiscent of Russell’s Paradox which asks the question: “Is the set that contains all sets itself a set?” Thus can G-d, who contains everything, be something?